Given its ability to produce unbelievable amounts of bass for its size, are transmission line loudspeakers qualify as the ultimate domestic hi-fi loudspeakers?
By: Ringo Bones
As of late, there has been discussion on how come hi-fi audio
designer Arthur Radford’s electronics – especially his EL34 based audio power
amplifiers like the Radford STA25 - get more recognition in comparison to his transmission line
loudspeakers which despite being manufactured 50 or so years ago can still
manage to hold its own in a side-by-side comparison to more recently
manufactured hi-fi loudspeakers. Arthur Radford did a lot of work, both
theoretical and practical, on transmission line loudspeaker design during the
1960s.The Radford Studio 90 which was also sold in the U.S. in kit form during the
late 1960s as the Audionics TL90 – a ¼ wavelength 3-way transmission line loudspeaker
equipped with Radford sourced drivers and crossover circuit. The Radford Studio
90 was the first commercially manufactured hi-fi transmission line loudspeaker
based on A.R. Bailey’s papers and there are even larger models based on the
same design. Even though they were a bit pricey when they first entered the
market, enough of them were sold in the United States to establish a “cult
following” of this legendary loudspeakers. Despite their excellent subjective
sound quality, why are transmission line loudspeakers relatively rare in
comparison to competing designs? But first, here’s an introduction on the
theoretical and practical principles of transmission line loudspeakers.
Then and now, designers of closed-box / acoustic suspension
and vented / bass reflex loudspeaker systems have long been able to make heavy
use of computers, while transmission line systems had been designed by
cut-and-try methods. Transmission line loudspeaker systems are more complicated
to design because of their inherent distributed-parameter nature. By way of
comparison, sealed / acoustic suspension and vented / bass reflex loudspeaker
systems can be treated as a much simpler, lumped-parameter acoustic systems.
Also, there is still a dearth of research literature regarding transmission
line loudspeaker design to guide the prospective designer. But to those
adventurous enough, they should check out Quick & Easy Transmission Line
Speaker Design by Larry D. Sharp and those “white papers” published online by
John Wright of TDL.
Transmission line loudspeakers are known for their deep,
powerful bass and the way they grip a room, filling it with a full scale performance.
But they have their downsides too, notably the difficulty of tuning the line,
which appears to be the blackest of arts in the audio engineering world. A
practical transmission line has two main effects that are advantageous to
loudspeaker design. Firstly, the sound venting from the end of a
quarter-wavelength transmission line is 90-degrees out of phase with the signal
from the back of the cone which drives the line, which itself is 180-degrees
out of phase with the front radiation. This ensures that sound radiation at
lower frequencies is progressively moving into phase and it will add, rather
than subtract, to the forward low frequency response. Also a practical transmission line loudspeaker is lined with
acoustic felt and wool, so that a majority of upper bass and midrange energy is
absorbed before it reaches the end of the line and the outside world. Lower
frequency bass energy gets through, making low bass apparent. In electrical
engineering terms, a transmission line port is a low pass filter with a
270-degrees plus phase shift.
An area where transmission line loudspeakers receive
criticism is midrange coloration. To overcome this, various transmission line
loudspeaker designers over the years adapted a number of sensible design
features. If the transmission line vent length is made exactly ¼-wavelength in
length, it tends to act like a tuned pipe which introduces coloration. Making
the transmission line slightly shorter, a technique later adapted by John
Wright of TDL during the late 1960s, reduces this coloration without adversely
affecting bass quality.
In some transmission line loudspeaker designs where the line
is folded quickly behind the cone, the strongly reflected sound wave from the
cabinet wall can give that “clatter-type” coloration in the midrange. For this
reason, in newer transmission line loudspeaker designs, the rear wall of the
cabinet is kept as far back as possible and fitted with a generous covering of
soft, absorbent carpet felt.
One great thing about a transmission line loudspeaker is
that once the cabinet dimensions have been optimized and fixed, it can be
subtly tuned to give the bass quality you want in your listening room just by
altering the amount and density of long hair wool in the line. This makes
transmission line loudspeakers extremely versatile for home constructors, which
combined with their subjective performance explains why they’ve been making a
comeback since the 1990s hi-fi boom.
Another great advantage, or possibly the greatest advantage,
of transmission line loudspeakers – and probably why they’ve returned during
the 1990s in conjunction with the zero negative feedback single-ended-triode audio
amplification Renaissance of the period - is their highly damped impedance
curve. Impedance varies little across the entire audio spectrum – especially in
the upper bass and lower midrange region in comparison with vented / bass
reflex and closed box / acoustic suspension loudspeakers. This makes
transmission line loudspeakers much, much easier to drive with zero negative
feedback single-ended triode audio amplifiers and other low feedback vacuum
tube audio amplifier designs.
3 comments:
When it comes to transmission line loudspeaker design, I prefer the bigger ones due to its effortless bass. I think Radford made transmission line loudspeaker models much bigger than the 45-inch tall Studio 90s.
The Radford 360 was their biggest TL line. It used two Goodmans woofers on opposite sides in a dual tandem true 1/4 wavelength line. Midrange/tweeter modules were mounted on all four sides giving the system a 360 degree sound dispersion and high power handling. They needed lots of power too since the system was damn inefficient. Over time Radford changed the three drive units. The woofer to a newer version of the Goodmans BD25 offering substantially similar performance characteristics. The sealed back paper cone mid was changed to the MD6 2.5 inch soft dome from Peerless. It had a smoother more transparent characteristic with better dispersion but could sound a bit lean and nasal unless corrected with minor crossover mods. The tweeter was changed to another slightly smaller Peerless soft dome specified by Radford. It was an excellent unit.
Total performance of the system set up correctly could be awesome. In it's day many audiophiles declared the Radford 360 the best sound available. It was quite an experience playing ELP's 'Lucky Man' for this teenager in the mid 70s.
Hello,46 years ago I bought a pair of radford 180, and I still use them with a tandberg tuner p and I play records on a akai turntable that has a Sony induced cartridge it sounds amazing . and I also have a Radford HD amp and 2 radfordb.n 180 type speakers and I want to sell them soon my phone number is 07868037215. I am Mr wood ..
Post a Comment