Even though its innards are composed of a piezoelectric
material that’s only been mass produced after World War II, why are
piezoelectric ceramic cartridges still not considered audiophile enough for
high fidelity stereo vinyl LP playback?
By: Ringo Bones
From a scientific / engineering standpoint, it seems that
the “lowly” piezoelectric ceramic cartridge appears to be more advanced than
your typical mainstream moving coil and/or moving magnet cartridge for high
fidelity playback of stereo vinyl LPs. And yet in this day and age well into
the 21st Century, it is the moving coil and moving magnet types that
dominate the now esoteric – yet so hip – scene of the vinyl LP playback niche
of the audio world. But why is it that a diamond stylus sculpted to almost
nano-engineering precision will only be viable for high end high fidelity vinyl
LP playback when its mechanical undulations after reading the vinyl LP’s
microgrooves are connected to a mechanical actuator/pickup composed of a coil
of wire or magnet instead of a Bimorph Rochelle Salt, ammonium dihydrogen
phosphate or a barium titanate / combination lead titanate-lead zirconate piezoelectric
ceramic cartridge? But first, let’s briefly examine how LP became the dominant
Post World War II high fidelity music playback medium.
Modern vinyl LP playback for the home can trace its origins
back to June 1948 when Columbia Records introduced the microgroove 33 and 1/3
rpm long-playing (LP) record as a better sounding and longer playing time
alternative to the 78 rpm shellacs. Thanks to the work of Hungarian-born Peter
Goldmark who, with the help of William S. Bachman, invented the LP disc in a
laboratory set up by Columbia a few years before. Goldmark’s new record was cut
in hair-width grooves, utilized a new electronic equalization system – i.e. the
now standard for LP called the RIAA playback equalization where all of the
music recording industry eventually all adopted back in 1953 – to balance the
tone along all portions of the groove, was pressed in non-breakable vinylite
plastic, and was played in a new turntable that recorded steadily at a new
speed of 33 and 1/3 revolutions per minute.
Not to be outdone, rival music recording industry bigwig RCA
Victor thereupon issued their 45-rpm “donut” discs – and eventually the “hi-fi
world” adopted both 33 1/3 and 45-rpm speeds as standard for post WWII vinyl
record playback. Eventually, RCA Victor also produced its very own version of
33 1/3-rpm vinyl long-playing records from their burgeoning Classical Music
catalogue – and thus paving the way for the Golden Age of Stereo of the 1950s
onwards.
Till this day, piezoelectric ceramic cartridges have a very
glaring advantage over their moving coil and moving magnet cartridge counterparts,
they can produce and output signal that can reach a peak of 1 volt – as opposed
to high end moving coil cartridge that are as expensive as a South Korean made
4-door sedan whose signal output measures only around 5-microvolts or so. This
allows ceramic cartridges to be connected directly to the line-level / AUX
input of your preamplifier with only a passive RIAA circuit for tone shaping / tonal compensation.
But sadly, ceramic cartridge design seems to be stuck in the
1950s because the stylus compliance of a typical piezoelectric ceramic
cartridge is poor compared to either moving coil or moving magnet cartridge, so
greater tracking force is necessary in using ceramic cartridges – which will
inevitably exacerbate record wear. Ceramic cartridges also require about
1-megaohm load resistance – whereas most line-level / auxiliary / AUX inputs
have far less – typically about 50-kilohms and even less for some solid-state
preamps – which means bass output will be drastically cut. Though vacuum tube
preamps and power amps in the 1950s with an EF86 tube input stage usually has
input impedance greater than 1-megaohm – like Peter Walker’s famed Quad II
power amp for example.
And as a reminder for those folks way too young to remember
– Bimorph Rochelle Salt Crystals used in some very high output piezoelectric
ceramic cartridges are very sensitive to environmental conditions and should
not be kept and used in places where the temperature exceeds 125 degrees
Fahrenheit. But if top high end vinyl LP playback cartridge manufacturers try to
develop this very instant their own line of high-end piezoelectric ceramic
cartridges with the advantage of a really high signal output with much improved
mechanical stylus compliance so that tracking force is equal to that of most
moving coil and moving magnet cartridges – who knows where vinyl LP will be a
few years hence. By the way, despite of the drastically cut low-frequencies,
those cheap and cheerful piezoelectric ceramic cartridges can replicate a
well-recorded well-thwacked snare drum better than similarly priced moving coil
or moving magnet cartridges.
2 comments:
Even though I've yet to audition one first hand, have you ever heard the Micro-Acoustics System II stereo cartridge? According to their advert in the January 1981 edition of Stereo Review magazine, the Micro-Acoustics System II stereo cartridge is more than just a new cartridge design - it is a new cartridge technology. The Micro-Acoustics System II - like the best solid state power amplifiers at the time - is direct coupled. Supposedly providing a transient response up to 10 times faster than either moving coil or moving magnet stereo cartridges for vinyl LP playback at that period.
The Micro-Acoustics System II supposedly has a patented electret transducing system that is supposedly up to ten times faster than conventional moving coil and moving magnet stereo cartridges. In some of their adverts, the Micro-Acoustics System II is supposedly capable of very good transient response by being able to produce a perfect square wave.
Post a Comment